shadowdive: (i am inside your head)
Vanitas ([personal profile] shadowdive) wrote2011-10-11 01:57 am

19 // [text]

What do you all think of the term, "an eye for an eye"?

text || filtered

[identity profile] usedrecover.livejournal.com 2011-11-21 10:05 am (UTC)(link)
Hm...? My, my, this wasn't included in the introductory information. It's a far cry from the hundredth person of the hour gushing about how cute their little precious Pokemon is. I wonder if they're aware of the risks, or maybe they're just ignorant and blissful because of that.

text || filtered

[identity profile] subvertio.livejournal.com 2011-11-22 07:41 am (UTC)(link)
[Then again, his Charizard snapped his arm in a few places a couple months ago because he wanted to fight more, and it was like a child throwing a tantrum. With painful, burnt results.]

text || filtered

[identity profile] usedrecover.livejournal.com 2011-11-22 09:10 am (UTC)(link)
That's to be expected. People often turn a blind eye to the bigger problem, until it ends up being too big for them to handle. They recognize the pokemon are powerful, and that they're owning them, but they don't understand the implications of that.

I wonder what would happen if pokemon decided to rebel...

text || filtered

[identity profile] usedrecover.livejournal.com 2011-11-23 09:42 am (UTC)(link)
I guess if most of us had our abilities we wouldn't have a need for pokemon. I suppose it's Johto's own security measure.

text || filtered

[identity profile] usedrecover.livejournal.com 2011-11-29 09:52 am (UTC)(link)
If it was destroyed maybe we'd just be sent home. Johto would have no reason to keep us here; it'd just send us back.

text || filtered

[identity profile] usedrecover.livejournal.com 2011-11-30 07:45 am (UTC)(link)
I'm sure if it can import people it can import trees. They'll run out of places to put them in New Bark and they will expand.

[ Lust is just being really dry right now. ]

text || filtered

[identity profile] subvertio.livejournal.com 2011-11-30 07:50 am (UTC)(link)
[It's amusing to him anyway.] Not if we're destroying everything faster than it can bring things in.

text || filtered

[identity profile] usedrecover.livejournal.com 2011-11-30 08:00 am (UTC)(link)
Once we have nothing left to destroy we'll realize it won't work and stop. We can't destroy something that's not there.

text || filtered

[identity profile] usedrecover.livejournal.com 2011-11-30 09:24 am (UTC)(link)
We're not going to be dying so how would we accomplish that? The last one with a finger intact wins?

text || filtered

[identity profile] usedrecover.livejournal.com 2011-12-01 04:21 pm (UTC)(link)
They're just temporarily knocked out, and then they're made good as new. Mortal injury just can't be afflicted.

I suppose you're right. Those that are killed should stay dead. Defying natural laws? Tch. I wonder what's next, walking on air?
[ It's ironic lust persecutes others for being immortal. ]

text || filtered

[identity profile] usedrecover.livejournal.com 2011-12-03 09:26 am (UTC)(link)
Ah, yes, how could I forget the obstacles that seem to exist for no reason other than to get in the way.

I suppose now that we know that gravity isn't going to be behaving like it should be, the rest of science's laws aren't going to be obeyed here. Erasing gravity shouldn't be a privilege; it shouldn't even be a right.